Donate and support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?c=1785147
Firstly the voting rights question… I agree with him that the right to vote shouldn't be restricted from any members of a democracy, but in answering that question, why not point out how loaded it is? The asker paints convicted felons as rapists and terrorists, why not mention the high numbers of first time non-violent offenders? Particularly members of minority groups, then linking it back to what he was saying about voter suppression?
When asked about failed socialist states, why not point out the successes of socialist states in scandanavia, or the successes of socialist policies in major countries i.e. Socialized medicine?
I think people relate less to the theoretical rights analysis and ideologies than concrete examples, or just pointing out how loaded the questions are.