If public universities become free under a President Sanders, would that mean colleges like UVA and Michigan would be free for anyone regardless of the state you come from?

Donate and support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?c=1785147

Hello, everyone.

Recently, I’ve been wondering exactly this: If public universities become free under a President Sanders, would that mean colleges like UVA and Michigan would be free for anyone regardless of the state you come from?

If you don’t know already, UVA and Michigan are both arguably the top two public universities in the USA. But, would they be made free for anyone regardless of the state under a President Sanders? Or would it be free only for in state students?

Thank you!

submitted by /u/TheAmbitiousPerson
[link] [comments]
SandersForPresident: search results – self:yes

I just phonebanked for 15 minutes – my very first time! Join me and spend just a few minutes calling California and helping Senator Sanders become President!

Donate and support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?c=1785147

submitted by /u/Malthepal
[link] [comments]
SandersForPresident: search results – self:yes

Would President Sanders reestablish the Fairness Doctrine?

Donate and support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?c=1785147

I would like to see Senator Sanders advocate for a return to the Fairness Doctrine. The very rich corporate types have learned a lot since the 1960's. They bought up media. They ensured that the news that media presented no longer had to be impartial(ish). You might ask why, since 1987, was the Fairness Doctrine not reintroduced into the FCC rules by any Presidential administration. The rule was removed from the Federal Register in 2011 and should be returned and implemented as soon as possible; "The main agenda for the doctrine was to ensure that viewers were exposed to a diversity of viewpoints. In 1969 the United States Supreme Court, in Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, upheld the FCC's general right to enforce the fairness doctrine where channels were limited. However, the Court did not rule that the FCC was obliged to do so.[4] The courts reasoned that the scarcity of the broadcast spectrum, which limited the opportunity for access to the airwaves, created a need for the doctrine."; The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the policy in 1987 and removed the rule that implemented the policy from the Federal Register in August 2011.;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

submitted by /u/keith707aero
[link] [comments]
SandersForPresident: search results – self:yes